Systems’ from other recordkeeping or ratings schemes based both on the breadth Surveillance, scoring, and gamification through rewards and punishments. Social credit should not be used as a stand-in for allĬhinese government uses of new data technology, nor should China be used solelyĪs a foil for our fears about technology’s creeping reach into privacy andĮssential characteristics of a social credit system as including tracking and Of technology, governance, and society, but meaningful comparison requiresĪccurate understanding. Storiesįrom Xinjiang already confirm these fears.ĭespite these differences, or because of them, thereĬan be great comparative value for democracies in watching China’s integration
Potential criminals by opaque algorithms. There will be less resistance to invasive data collection, wrongful arrestsįrom facial recognition misidentifications, or over-inclusive profiling of This means there will be fewer brakes on governmentĮxperimentation with new technologies in the pursuit of stability and order. Individual rights as inherently subordinate to obligations to maintain social
China tracking and scoring citizens free#
It lacks a healthy civil society or free media toįoster debate and draw attention to potential abuses, it lacks independentĬourts that might check police power, and it has a government that views
Many of these issues may be global,īut China is different. Securing personal data, limiting collection and use of online information, andĬontrolling the spread of misinformation. Privacy, and individuality in China and elsewhere. "I think it’s really concerning because the universities have no way of ensuring the tech they’re helping these develop and improve are going to be used in ethical ways.Technology is redefining citizenship, governance, "Scientists like. . .those who visited Princeton are among the thousands of officers and cadres who have been sent abroad as PhD students or visiting scholars in the past decade. It's also sending scientists to western universities in order to obtain overseas expertise in AI.Īlex Joske, a researcher studying the Chinese Communist party at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, reportedly said there are thousands of scientists with links to the Chinese army that have travelled to western universities in recent years. The US and China are dominating the world's AI "race" but China is investing heavily in order to get an edge. "These were academic papers written by researchers at universities - Google is not involved with these projects and has no partnerships with the Chinese universities in question,” a Google spokesperson reportedly said. Google is reportedly distancing itself from studies where its staff teamed up with researchers and corporations in China. Their paper can be found here. Funkhouser declined to comment. The trio looked at how computer vision research can be used in unmanned drones and autonomous underwater vehicles. Thomas Funkhouser, a Google senior staff research scientist, worked with two visiting NUDT scientists when he was a visiting professor at Princeton University last year. Interestingly, four of the US academics are affiliated with Google. All of them declined to comment, according to the FT. The researchers in the US have links to organisations like Nokia Bell Labs, Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Sydney in Australia.
The research partnerships identified by the FT leave the western academics complicit in China’s human rights abuses, possibly inadvertently. Human rights campaigners have taken particular issue with how the Chinese government is using surveillance technology to target Uighurs in the region of Xinjiang, and there are widespread concerns that Beijing has gone too far in terms of surveillance - references to a Big Brother state or George Orwell's "1984" are common.
0 kommentar(er)
